When it comes to meetings, I am told that among my management peers, I have the reputation of having a structure fetish. I insist on an agenda and notes for every meeting (except confidential one-on-ones), and on cross-references to existing documentation, applicable issues tracked in an issue tracker, or wiki pages.
Your thoughts?
Follow
@xahteiwi I think striking the right balance between being to formal and overbearing and to casual.
I tend to find the most important is keeping track of the actions that arise and who they are assigned to.
Plus circulating the topic and key bullet points of what needs to be discussed, to all parties before the meeting.
